Several members of my lab use % ERD as feedback, and they have attributed some importance to the actual percentage value. Therefore I have to pass the ERD % to the application. This should be easy to do in the normalizer if I add another AdaptationTypes and check for it during Update(). Let me know if there's a better way to go about getting the event-related amplitude change (in % baseline) to the application.
I guess that this isn't a change you want to include in the BCI2000 source because it would break all the standard applications to have the control signal vary between -100 and +100, but I thought I'd ask anyway in case it is another highly requested feature.
Normalizing by mean instead of variance
-
gschalk
- Posts: 615
- Joined: 28 Jan 2003, 12:37
Re: Normalizing by mean instead of variance
Chad,
For most applications, z-scoring is probably quite some better than doing % change, but what you suggest definitely makes sense for your lab.
Gerv
For most applications, z-scoring is probably quite some better than doing % change, but what you suggest definitely makes sense for your lab.
Gerv
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
