Page 1 of 1
does BCI2000 3.0 support two-byte coding in P300 speller ?
Posted: 03 Jun 2011, 06:15
by normal
In the version 2.0. We have successfully made P300 Speller read and display the two-byte symbols on the screen. However, the new version 3.0 seems doesn't support the two-byte coding. Any solution for that?
Thanks!
Re: does BCI2000 3.0 support two-byte coding in P300 speller
Posted: 03 Jun 2011, 14:34
by mellinger
When we switched to Qt, the BCI2000 configuration editor lost its ability to support two-byte symbols. On your request, I made some changes which are supposed to make everything compatible again in
revision 3307.
However, I need to ask you to test it and report any problems, because I cannot try it myself.
Thanks,
Juergen
Re: does BCI2000 3.0 support two-byte coding in P300 speller
Posted: 06 Jun 2011, 08:28
by normal
Thanks Juergen!
The update works well.
It seems that only four files are relevant for this 3307 change.
Localization.cpp
StatusBar.cpp
TextField.cpp
TextWindow.cpp.
After the recompiling, the final Application window displays the two-byte symbols correctly, even though the parameter setting window (the matrix setting window) doesn't.
Re: does BCI2000 3.0 support two-byte coding in P300 speller
Posted: 07 Jun 2011, 10:23
by mellinger
Thanks for your response.
It seems that only four files are relevant for this 3307 change.
What do you mean by that? What about the changes to the Operator module in the remaining files? Did you apply them, and did you recompile the Operator module? I would like the parameter setting window to display two-byte symbols correctly as well, if possible.
Regards,
Juergen
Re: does BCI2000 3.0 support two-byte coding in P300 speller
Posted: 19 Aug 2011, 01:17
by normal
It seems that only four files are relevant for this 3307 change.
What do you mean by that? What about the changes to the Operator module in the remaining files? Did you apply them, and did you recompile the Operator module? I would like the parameter setting window to display two-byte symbols correctly as well, if possible.
Thank you Juergen. I'm sorry that I did not log in to check the post for a long time.
Yes, after recompiling the operator module, the two-byte symbols are displayed correctly.
H.Y.Zheng