A bias between offline and online sessions
Posted: 03 Aug 2009, 06:43
Hi, I have one question.
I am now trying to do online bci experiment using FeedbackDemo_SignalGenerator.bat, I just added gUSBampSource.exe to use the notch filter.
The algorithm I applied is CSP plus LDA. For the offline training the accuracy was around 80%, and I saved the coefficients for CSP and LDA. During the online session, each trial is band-pass filtered, then multipled by the CSP spatial filters and then multipled with LDA coefficients.
My problem is that it seems for the online session, in the MATLAB engine I checked bci_OutSignal, it could be always positive or negative, like a baseline shifting (This could happen no matter whether the subject is looking at the screen or not). However, when I tried offline classifying the recorded online data with the same coefficients of CSP and LDA, the output is not the same as bci_OutSignal as seen in the MATLAB engine. The output value is much smaller than bci_OutSignal.
Has anyone met such a problem and how can this be explained?
Thanks a lot !
I am now trying to do online bci experiment using FeedbackDemo_SignalGenerator.bat, I just added gUSBampSource.exe to use the notch filter.
The algorithm I applied is CSP plus LDA. For the offline training the accuracy was around 80%, and I saved the coefficients for CSP and LDA. During the online session, each trial is band-pass filtered, then multipled by the CSP spatial filters and then multipled with LDA coefficients.
My problem is that it seems for the online session, in the MATLAB engine I checked bci_OutSignal, it could be always positive or negative, like a baseline shifting (This could happen no matter whether the subject is looking at the screen or not). However, when I tried offline classifying the recorded online data with the same coefficients of CSP and LDA, the output is not the same as bci_OutSignal as seen in the MATLAB engine. The output value is much smaller than bci_OutSignal.
Has anyone met such a problem and how can this be explained?
Thanks a lot !