BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Griffin,
thanks for finding these bugs. I have created the following two tickets to track the effort to fix these bugs:
http://www.bci2000.org/tracproj/ticket/184
http://www.bci2000.org/tracproj/ticket/185
Regards, Peter
thanks for finding these bugs. I have created the following two tickets to track the effort to fix these bugs:
http://www.bci2000.org/tracproj/ticket/184
http://www.bci2000.org/tracproj/ticket/185
Regards, Peter
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 12:42
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Thanks Peter,
In the future, should I just post stuff like this to the bug tracker? What sort of bug reports should go here?
-Griff
In the future, should I just post stuff like this to the bug tracker? What sort of bug reports should go here?
-Griff
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Griffin,
the bug tracker is for pretty much for everything for which you have a minimum working example, or a general issue that needs to be addressed. If you already have isolated the the issue this would also be wonderful. Just post the link to the bug tracker into the BBS so other users are aware of it. Jürgen works directly off the bug tracker, hence the better described and isolated the issue use the more effective he can fix it.
Btw. what is your interim verdict for BCI2000?
Regards, Peter
the bug tracker is for pretty much for everything for which you have a minimum working example, or a general issue that needs to be addressed. If you already have isolated the the issue this would also be wonderful. Just post the link to the bug tracker into the BBS so other users are aware of it. Jürgen works directly off the bug tracker, hence the better described and isolated the issue use the more effective he can fix it.
Btw. what is your interim verdict for BCI2000?
Regards, Peter
-
- Posts: 58
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 12:42
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Got it.
Not sure what you mean by my "interim verdict", but I think it's getting really close! I haven't done much with the contributions lately, so I'm not entirely sure if they're working well, but I've done some timing tests on our Blackrock system and I can validate that I've got really nice looking AV timings. Some of these bugs might be worth just marking as "known issues", as the only users who are going to run into them as an issue will probably be compiling from source anyway, and can just apply a patch after the release.
-Griff
Not sure what you mean by my "interim verdict", but I think it's getting really close! I haven't done much with the contributions lately, so I'm not entirely sure if they're working well, but I've done some timing tests on our Blackrock system and I can validate that I've got really nice looking AV timings. Some of these bugs might be worth just marking as "known issues", as the only users who are going to run into them as an issue will probably be compiling from source anyway, and can just apply a patch after the release.
-Griff
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 12 Aug 2015, 07:42
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Hi,
I'm trying to check the latest source code version (v3.6) from the svn repository, but when I log on the repo the version that I have access to is the R5290 (v.3.0.5), how can I checkout the latest version?
Regards,
Okba
I'm trying to check the latest source code version (v3.6) from the svn repository, but when I log on the repo the version that I have access to is the R5290 (v.3.0.5), how can I checkout the latest version?
Regards,
Okba
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Okbalefthanded,
the SVN revision R5290 on http://www.bci2000.org/svn/trunk is the most recent code base for BCI2000 v3.6 beta. The only reason you see v.3.0.5 in the Operator is, because we have not yet updated that string in the source code. Let me know if you have any issues with this version.
Regards, Peter
the SVN revision R5290 on http://www.bci2000.org/svn/trunk is the most recent code base for BCI2000 v3.6 beta. The only reason you see v.3.0.5 in the Operator is, because we have not yet updated that string in the source code. Let me know if you have any issues with this version.
Regards, Peter
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Thanks for the update. I am still having the same issues as described in this thread though,
http://www.bci2000.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3211
The beta versions just crash every time for me. The full release is more stable as expected but I still have an online prediction issue. I don't know if its a BCI2000 and BCILAB communication issues issue, or one of them and Matlab.
http://www.bci2000.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3211
The beta versions just crash every time for me. The full release is more stable as expected but I still have an online prediction issue. I don't know if its a BCI2000 and BCILAB communication issues issue, or one of them and Matlab.
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Dear BCI2000 users,
we are nearing the final release of BCI2000 v3.6.
I would like to encourage all BCI2000 users to download and test the latest release candidate.
Regards, Peter
we are nearing the final release of BCI2000 v3.6.
I would like to encourage all BCI2000 users to download and test the latest release candidate.
Regards, Peter
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Dear BCI2000 users,
we are nearing the final release of BCI2000 v3.6.
I would like to encourage all BCI2000 users to download and test the latest release candidate based on SVN revision 5558.
Regards, Peter
we are nearing the final release of BCI2000 v3.6.
I would like to encourage all BCI2000 users to download and test the latest release candidate based on SVN revision 5558.
Regards, Peter
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Hello,
I cannot conect with Emotiv EPOC +, my OS is windows 10 64bits, see the error in the image please, I have the software Emotic TestBench
Hope you can help me.
Regards
I cannot conect with Emotiv EPOC +, my OS is windows 10 64bits, see the error in the image please, I have the software Emotic TestBench
Hope you can help me.
Regards
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
Dear all,
I cannot find a source module for acquisition with the ANT-neuro eego , is it available, or could someone that have implemented it share the module?
With Thanks
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 05 Nov 2017, 14:43
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
I couldn't find the liveamp source . DId you have precompiled version of liveamp source?
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
The LiveAmp source (and many others that are available in the current source code) is not in there. Does anybody know of a way to access this stuff without building and compiling? This is no problem for software developers (actually, it is quite a well managed repository) but for others, running cmake and installing Qt and MSVC versions might not be so easy.
Re: BCI2000 v3.6 beta test
I take it back. I just did a fresh install of http://bci2000.org/downloads/bin/BCI2000.x32.x64.beta.R5711.setup.exe and LiveAmpSource was there.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests