Search found 5 matches

by biocc
02 Nov 2016, 13:49
Forum: BCI Systems - Brain Signals
Topic: Analyzing recorded data after a SMR feedback session
Replies: 2
Views: 4366

Re: Analyzing recorded data after a SMR feedback session

Peter Thank you very much for your answer. I would like to use Offline Analysis Tool, since I have found the features in the initial session with this tool. But I don’t how to complete the Target Conditions, when I'm using data recorded from the feedback session using the Cursor Task Application Can...
by biocc
02 Nov 2016, 11:30
Forum: BCI Systems - Brain Signals
Topic: Analyzing recorded data after a SMR feedback session
Replies: 2
Views: 4366

Analyzing recorded data after a SMR feedback session

Hi I'm trying to analyze the recorded data in a sensorimotor ryhthm feedback session in order to to track and adapt to signal changes in the subject’s parameters. I'd like to know if is it possible to do it with the offline analysis tool available in BCI2000, and how to do it. Thanks in advance for ...
by biocc
15 Aug 2016, 16:47
Forum: BCI Systems - User Applications
Topic: BCI2000 Automation
Replies: 1
Views: 1389

BCI2000 Automation

Hi I'm using BCI2000 automation to run BCI2000 from an aplication in Matlab. I'm using the modules: Signal Generator, ARSignalProcessing, CursorTask. According to the parameters I'm using, I have only one trial. I'm having a problem when I want to resume a new trial from the application, because I d...
by biocc
15 Sep 2015, 14:19
Forum: Configuration
Topic: Gmobilab+: a question about Sourcechgain
Replies: 2
Views: 1240

Re: Gmobilab+: a question about Sourcechgain

Thank you very much for your answer, I'll try what you propose.

Regards,

Carol
by biocc
14 Sep 2015, 18:48
Forum: Configuration
Topic: Gmobilab+: a question about Sourcechgain
Replies: 2
Views: 1240

Gmobilab+: a question about Sourcechgain

Hi, I'm using gMobilab+ and I have a doubt about the configuration of the parameter SourceChgain in the source module. I've load the gMobilab.prm and the value of this parameter is 0.019. Does it have any relationship with the sensibility of the amplifier?in that case it is reported to be 0.0153 mic...